Creation radiometric dating Sex chats with orientals camera online
"How can creationists expect people to accept a young earth when science has proved through radiometric dating that the earth is billions of years old?" This article addresses that question, which represents the thinking of a large number of people today.Many geologists claim that radiometric “clocks” show rocks to be millions of years old.However, to read any clock accurately we must know where the clock was set at the beginning.Since God is the Creator of all things (including science), and His Word is true (“), the true age of the earth must agree with His Word.The topic of radiometric dating has received some of the most vicious attacks by young earth creation science theorists.However, none of the criticisms of young earth creationists have any scientific merit.Radiometric dating remains a reliable scientific method.
“The widespread emanation of C-free volcanogenic carbon dioxide after the Flood would have further inflated the carbon-14 dates of tree rings in a systematic manner in many parts of the world.”[vii] Naturalists have to assume whether wood remains were near volcanic vents or not.
They point to a catastrophic origin for granites, consistent with the biblical timeframe for earth history and God’s judgment during the Flood.
Many accept radiometric dating methods as proof that the earth is millions of years old, in contrast to the biblical timeline.
Creationists do admit that radioactive decay has occurred, but “it is important to understand the simple, fundamental principle behind all dating methods, and why they are not able to produce objective, absolute dates…The fatal flaw is that all scientific measurements are made in the present, whereas a date relates to a time in the past.
We cannot go back into the past to measure all the parameters we need in order to do the dating calculation.